Tuesday, September 9, 2008

KingCast to Senator Joe Biden in Nashua: New Hampshire's biggest problem is Republican AG Kelly Ayotte, a proven liar and protector of bad police.

Dear Senator Biden:

I have already told Senator Obama about the need to enforce existing gun laws as it pertains to a maniacal three-time felon named Gregory W. Floyd, who should be up on 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(1) charges. People in North Country have signed petitions to that effect and we are soon presenting them to the ATF. Also, today we have new proof that NH AG Kelly Ayotte is a complete liar. She told me this week that her office had no responsive documents when I asked for the Michael Paulhus file, but in point of fact Nashua Telegraph reporter Andy Wolfe sent me this email yesterday proving that Senior AAG Brown conducted an investigation.

Note further that no bullet trajectories were conducted,
which is exactly what the State failed to do in the 2007 Bruce McKay, Liko Kenney, Gregory W. Floyd shooting tragedy with respect to a certain windshield bullet and other spent shell casings that prove that Gregory Floyd lied about his actions on 5/11. Here is a list of unacceptable deviations from Homicide protocol norms, included in the comments. And look what the Union Leader wrote about Kelly Ayotte right here. And they are ignoring Diane Lyon's police abuse case; look at her arm.

Run a word search for "This American Life + Epiphany" on this blawg to view the facts, and please make every attempt you can to have Kelly Ayotte impeached. What politicians like her and State Rep. and would-be Senator Martha McLeod are doing today is no better than what happened 25 years ago when NH LE Richard Dow likely murdered his wife and adoptive son and got away with it in 24 hours. McLeod even thinks her emails are not subject to public review. Read up on Dow ex-fiancee Karen Saffian's attempts to rectify that situation here, and also read KingCast v. McLeod et al., Grafton 08-E-192.

Very Truly Yours, Christopher King, J.D./KingCast.net


Christopher King said...

From the 15 March 2005 Nashua Telegraph:

"The state attorney general’s office investigated the incident, as it does all police shootings. Senior Assistant Attorney General Simon Brown said soon after the incident that the shooting appeared to be justified, and said more recently that he does not expect that initial conclusion will change.

However, Brown won’t wrap up his report on the incident until after he reviews Fauteux’s testimony in Paulhus’ trial, he told Hillsborough County Superior Court Judge Bernard Hampsey on Monday.

Paulhus’ lawyers also want to question state police about their investigation into the incident, Tahmassebipour said. Investigators searched Paulhus’ van and seized various evidence, including bullet fragments, and sent it up to the lab but then didn’t request any testing, such as ballistics or trajectory analysis, she said."

Kelly Ayotte’s Deviations from norm in 2007:

1. No fingerprints taken of anything, particularly of Liko Kenney’s second clip. Frankly I think she’s lying because when I motioned for these in Court she fought me over it instead of saying “we don’t have any.” Later on she said “we don’t have any.” This is crucial because Floyd’s prints should not be on Liko’s second clip. Floyd said Liko was trying to load that magazine but it is entirely possible that he was not and that Floyd loaded it and hence the bullet he took home in his pocket.

2. Failure to handcuff Floyd, a possible murder and criminal threats suspect.

3. Failure to pat down Floyd, who took crucial evidence home with him in his pocket.

4. Failure to analyse from where Floyd commenced shooting vis a vis the several spent casings 30 feet from Liko Kenney’s car.

5. Failure to analyse whether Bruce McKay fired his weapon. If Bruce did not fire his weapon it means that all the spent McKay casings came from Floyd’s use of McKay’s weapon, and if it be so, then each and every shot has to be analysed for its propriety or lack thereof. In addition to issues involving Liko Kenney, this goes to the criminal threats issue regarding Caleb Macaulay as well. This is part of the pending RSA 91-A litigation on RSA 611:B-21 because the State will not release ANY autopsy or toxicology reports that would show the presence or absence of GSR on McKay’s hands. As Liko shot McKay from 20 feet away, outside, there would not be any GSR on Bruce McKay’s hands unless he fired his weapon.

6. Failure to accept the two corroborated versions from Caleb Macaulay and from Gregory P. Floyd (pdf p. 745) that Floyd did not speak to Liko Kenney prior to shooting him. See #6, infra.

7. Failure to accept the two first statements from Gregory W. Floyd that he did not speak to Liko Kenney prior to shooting him. See #5, infra.

8. Reaching a conclusion, seen at p. 42 of her official report, that Floyd was unarmed when he saw Liko Kenney’s car strike Bruce McKay, which is in direct contravention to the windshield bullet and to Gregory P. Floyd’s statements again at pdf. 745.

9. Failure to conduct any inquiry into the propriety or impropriety of the traffic stops, given that litigation revealed that Bruce McKay violated at least eight (8) clear cut pursuit and OC Spray policies and procedures.

10. Clearing a man like Floyd, with a known violent history and felony convictions, of any and all possible wrongdoing in about 24 hours, or nearly six (6) weeks before the ballistics report was issued, while withholding crucial military documents that show his propensity for lying.

11. There may be more, and we plan to file this before Oral Argument so that the U.S. House can be waiting for a copy of the Official Hearing Transcript, you bet. Or as Bruce would say via his vanity plates, “GOTCHA!”

12. Funny, my vanity plates read “CIVLRTS” so in some ways it’s CIVLRTS vs. GOTCHA.

Christopher King said...

From: "Ayotte, Kelly" Kelly.Ayotte@doj.nh.gov
To: "Harold Burbank II"
Cc: "Strelzin, Jeffery" Jeffery.Strelzin@doj.nh.gov; "Young, Jane" Jane.Young@doj.nh.gov
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 11:02 AM
Subject: RE: Liko Kenney

Dear Mr. Burbank,

Given that you have served as an Assistant AG, I am surprised that you would based[sic] your conclusions about a criminal case based on information described in blogs.[Yah, trust Kelly instead, sure bet there.....] As Attorney General, I based my conclusions on the investigation of this case. [You mean the ballistics tests that weren’t even back yet? Or the fact that Floyd’s own son, Floyd himself and Caleb Macaulay all say Floyd never spoke before shooting Liko Kenney and Floyd’s own son said that his pappy shot at Liko before Liko's car struck McKay?]

This case was investigated by the Major Crime Unit of our State Police, who had 20 investigators working on this case. [Yet somehow they allowed Floyd to go home with Liko Kenney’s live round in his pocket, and somehow they neglected to fingerprint the weapons and magazines as Kelly claimed after I asked for them?]

First, of all, there was no court order prohibiting or even mentioning that Corporal McKay could not stop Liko Kenney or had to seek other officers assistance. Although after Mr. Kenney took off after refusing to produce his license and registration, Cpl. McKay did call for backup which unfortunately did not arrive in time. [There is more on this coming, but more was said in that court hearing than appears in the order. Also, McKay called for backup then played head games with Liko by telling him he was not entitled to backup when Liko already specifically told McKay in 2003 “I am a mental health patient,” in the part of the Fox Hill video that Kelly and WMUR et al DID NOT post on YouTube. KingCast and the Franconia Collective posted it].

The majority of the incident was captured on video, including the initial stop and the shooting. In fact, on the tape you can see where Mr. Floyds truck is and where he witnessed the entire event and intervened. The witness statements were all consistent in describing Mr. Floyd's actions (including the passenger of Mr. Kenney's car). [This may be the biggest lie of Kelly Ayotte’s career. To the extent the statements are consistent, the corroborated version holds that Floyd never spoke to Liko Kenney, but yet and still the official version by the State, as regurgitated on ABC News 20/20, is that he did.]

There are also radio transmissions of his son on the police radio trying to get assistance as Mr. Floyd asked him to do as he intervened to assist the officer. There was no way for Mr. Floyd to know whether Cpl. McKay was still alive [If that is the case then he had no duty and no legal authority to act against Liko Kenney, whoops] and in fact, Emergency personnel described him as gasping for air when they got there. Based on NH law, and all the detailed interviews of all those present at the scene (including residents of the home in the area) and the video, we made our conclusions that no criminal actions would be brought against Mr. Floyd and I stand by that conclusion. [So the conclusion was made well before 15 May, and probably by 12 May]

With respect to the shooting itself, Cpl. McKay never even had his hand on his gun, when Mr. Kenney shot him multiple times. [But what did it look like to Liko after being OC Sprayed and seeing McKay holding something in his hand, down by his side, after McKay had just violated 8 pursuit and OC Spray policies?]

In fact, Cpl. McKay was turning away from him. Even after shooting him, he then proceeded to run him over and pinned him under the car. The police officer was murdered and Mr. Kenney's action[sic] were in no way justified. I understand you feel differently, but the facts demonstrate otherwise and this was thoroughly investigated.[Thoroughly investigated??? Please, spare me the nonsense we don’t even know how that bullet hole got in Liko Kenney’s windshield except that Floyd’s son said it came from his father, BEFORE Liko ever ran over McKay……and you never once investigated the situation behind the “43 Kills” that Floyd claimed to have made, given that you knew he was never in Vietnam as noted by a U.S. Military document (seen as document #1) that you withheld from the World public, Judge Vaughn let you get away with it but I won’t……and you also lied at p. 42 of your official report:

"Floyd was unarmed at the time he witnessed Liko Kenney shoot Cpl. McKay and then strike Cpl. McKay with his vehicle."]……he was not. He shot at Liko Kenney BEFORE Liko’s car struck McKay.

Feel free to contact your Senator.

Kelly Ayotte
[Attorney Burbank and others are going to do a whole lot more than just contact a Senator, Kelly. We have gone to National radio shows and are going to the U.S. House, and I have just sued you again using information gleaned in the first lawsuit because the application of RSA 611:B-21 in this case means that the public apparently has no right to know if Bruce McKay fired his weapon or if Gregory Floyd is lying about the number of times he shot. You gave Attorney Burbank a directive, and he and others are going to follow it. Suit yourself.]

Administrator said...

You may be interested in a blog about another unsolved murder in NH


john said...

Dear Christopher King, shut up. That Marine did the right thing. An eye for an eye. That suspect deserved to die. I will sleep well tonight, knowing MARINES keep us safe at home and rid the earth of scum, even while not on active duty.

Christopher King said...

No he didn't do the right thing, and he's a liar and the stop was Unconstitutional, Bruce McKay was a bully cop who instilled fear in people, and played cat and mouse with Liko Kenney and the NH AG is also a liar.

Wait for Casey Sherman's book, then you can shut up.

-The KingCaster.